Pii: S1359-6454(98)00409-1

ÐGamma-TiAl based alloys have recently received attention for potential elevated temperature applications in gas-turbine engines. However, although expected critical crack sizes for some targeted applications (e.g. gas-turbine engine blades) may be less than 0500 mm, most fatigue-crack growth studies to date have focused on the behavior of large (on the order of a few millimeters) through-thickness cracks. Since successful implementation of damage-tolerant life-prediction methodologies requires that the fatigue properties be understood for crack sizes representative of those seen in service conditions, the present work is focused on characterizing the initiation and growth behavior of small (a025±300 mm) fatigue cracks in a g-TiAl based alloy, of composition Ti±47Al±2Nb±2Cr±0.2B (at.%), with both duplex (average grain size of 017 mm) and re®ned lamellar (average colony size of 0145 mm) microstructures. Results are compared to the behavior of large (a>5 mm), through-thickness cracks from a previous study. Superior crack initiation resistance is observed in the duplex microstructure, with no cracks nucleating after up to 500 000 cycles at maximum stress levels (R= 0.1) in excess of the monotonic yield stress, sy. Comparatively, in the lamellar microstructure cracks nucleated readily at applied maximum stresses below the yield stress (85% sy) after as few as 500 cycles. In terms of crack growth, measurements for small fatigue cracks in the duplex and lamellar microstructures showed that both microstructures have comparable intrinsic fatiguecrack growth resistance in the presence of small ̄aws. This observation contrasts previous comparisons of large-crack data, where the lamellar structure showed far superior fatigue-crack growth resistance than the duplex structure. Such ``small-crack e€ects'' are examined both in terms of similitude (i.e. crack tip shielding) and continuum (i.e. biased microstructural sampling) limitations of traditional linear elastic fracture mechanics. # Published by Elsevier Science Ltd on behalf of Acta Metallurgica Inc.